Monitor More Assets with Less Maintenance

What if your sensors never needed a battery replacement? Imagine monitoring more assets, in more places, without adding another maintenance task.

Twisthink designs low-power and energy-harvesting sensor systems for hard-to-reach assets, reducing battery replacements, wiring, and field service.

Power should never be a bottleneck.

The Challenge

Battery replacements make remote monitoring too expensive to scale.

Many companies prove the value of remote monitoring with a successful pilot. Then reality sets in.

As deployments grow, replacing batteries, servicing sensors, and maintaining remote devices quickly becomes one of the largest costs of the entire solution.

Common challenges include:

Battery replacement limits how many assets can be monitored
Sensors are installed in locations that are difficult or expensive to access
Wiring is impractical or cost-prohibitive
Field maintenance reduces the return on investment
First-generation monitoring systems create more maintenance than expected

Monitor more. Maintain less.

Design monitoring systems that require less maintenance.

Twisthink helps companies rethink how connected sensing systems are powered.

Rather than accepting battery replacement as an unavoidable cost, we evaluate the application, operating environment, and available energy sources to determine the best long-term solution.

Whether that’s ultra-low-power electronics, energy harvesting, or a combination of both, we design systems that collect more data while requiring less maintenance.

Person uses smartphone near smart door lock. Mobile phone activates digital entry system for home or office. Modern contactless access via NFC or app. Safety and tech convenience.

The Path to
Low-Maintenance
Sensing

A low-maintenance sensing solution starts with understanding the environment—not simply choosing a battery.

  • Understand the application
  • Evaluate power options
  • Design the complete system
  • Optimize power consumption
  • Reduce maintenance
  • Scale with confidence
Understand the application

Identify what needs to be measured, how often data is required, and where sensors will operate.

Evaluate power options

Assess battery life, energy harvesting opportunities, wireless communication, and system tradeoffs.

Design the complete system

Develop the electronics, embedded software, sensing, and wireless architecture together to maximize efficiency.

Optimize power consumption

Reduce energy use through intelligent firmware, sleep strategies, and efficient communications.

Reduce maintenance

Minimize battery replacements, eliminate unnecessary service visits, and simplify long-term operation.

Scale with confidence

Deploy monitoring solutions across hundreds or thousands of assets without creating a maintenance burden.

Charity: water Uses IoT to Keep Clean Water Flowing for Millions

Charity: water partnered with Twisthink to develop an IoT sensing solution that remotely monitors water pumps in some of the world’s most difficult-to-reach communities. Because routine maintenance wasn’t practical, the sensor was designed with a long-life battery capable of operating for up to 10 years while continuously monitoring water flow and alerting teams to potential issues.

More insight:

[Case Study] charity: water

Read

Power built to last.

Frequently Asked Questions

FAQs

Q: When is a batteryless wireless sensor a realistic option?
A: A batteryless wireless sensor is realistic when it can collect enough energy from its environment to complete its sensing and communication tasks. Potential sources include light, heat, vibration, motion, radio-frequency energy, and near-field communication.

The use case also needs to tolerate the limits of the available energy. Batteryless devices work best with low-power sensors, short or infrequent transmissions, and a predictable energy source. They are less likely to fit applications that require continuous sensing, sustained wireless connectivity, or frequent high-power measurements.

Q: How do I know whether my device or use case can support energy harvesting?
A: The starting point is a power model that compares how much energy the device can generate with how much it will consume during sensing, processing, storage, and communication. That model should account for worst-case conditions, not just nominal performance. Many concepts appear feasible under ideal conditions but fail when the energy source weakens, temperatures change, or communication takes longer than expected.

If the model shows promise, the next step is to measure actual energy generation and consumption. Real-world testing often exposes losses, variability, and operating conditions that were not fully captured in the original model.

Q: What are the best ways to improve battery life for a wireless device?
A: Long battery life requires a system-level approach. It is rarely controlled by one component or a single operating condition.

Engineering teams often focus first on current draw while the device is actively sensing or transmitting. That matters, but larger gains often come from reducing the power consumed during the much longer periods when the device is idle. Sleep current, regulator efficiency, sensor standby current, radio behavior, firmware timing, and network retries can all create a continuous drain. The best results come from measuring the device’s complete power profile and reducing consumption across the full operating cycle.

Read our full guide to unlocking long battery life in connected devices.

Q: Which wireless technologies work best for low-power devices?
A: There is no single wireless technology that is best for every low-power device. The right choice depends on range, message size, reporting frequency, response time, available infrastructure, and the amount of energy the device can store.

We regularly use Bluetooth Low Energy for short-range communication with phones or nearby gateways. Low-power wide-area technologies such as LoRa can support longer ranges and small, infrequent messages. Cellular provides broad coverage but generally requires more energy and adds service costs. NFC can support extremely low-power or batteryless designs, but it requires a nearby reader.

Q: How do I make sure a battery-powered device works reliably in cold temperatures?
A: Cold-weather performance starts with selecting the right energy-storage technology for the application. In some cases, removing the battery and using supercapacitors can be an effective way to avoid the limitations of conventional battery chemistry.

When rechargeable batteries are required, lithium-titanate batteries may perform better in cold conditions than standard lithium-ion or lithium-polymer options. For long-life, non-rechargeable devices, chemistries such as lithium thionyl chloride or lithium manganese dioxide may be better suited than alkaline cells. The final choice should be validated under realistic temperatures, loads, transmission peaks, and end-of-life conditions.

Get
started.

Connected product development,
with a twist.

Create unprecedented impact with Twisthink.
Seize new opportunities and navigate change with clarity. Delivered straight to your inbox, “The Intersection” shares timely signals on what to chase, what to watch, and what to change – straight from where tech, design, and strategy meet – so you can move your business forward with confidence.
Sign Up